My mother worried about who I hung out with, especially in middle school. She constantly warned me that people are judged by the company they keep.
It turns out she was right. 20 years in IT asset disposition has shown me that when you surround yourself with troublemakers, you typically wind up guilty-by-association.
Unfortunately, that’s the situation that many of today’s IT Asset Managers are finding themselves in. When things go wrong, executives often blame them when the problem actually lies with their disposal vendor.
So, what’s the solution? How can ITAMs remain security superstars while also protecting themselves if things go south?
Let’s take a look.
Media coverage has helped increase awareness regarding the prevalence of fake electronics recyclers and the issues they cause. These include:
In response, the ITAD industry has developed environmental and regulatory standards to help safeguard companies against these problems. Leading electronics recyclers now adhere to best practices and voluntarily become R2 and e-Steward certified.
Despite this progress, however, thousands of fake recyclers still flourish, and some have been busted for falsifying R2 certificates in an attempt to win contracts. “Certified” recyclers have pled guilty to illegally shipping material overseas, wire fraud, tax evasion, criminal trafficking in counterfeit goods, unlawful storage of hazardous waste, falsifying records, lying to the government, and more.
I cringe whenever a certified recycler has a violation. The vast majority of certified recyclers are honest, ethical, and committed to improving the integrity of the ITAD industry. But bad actors are out there.
While the ITAD industry has evolved, procedures used by corporate America to manage the internal process of asset disposition have not kept pace. Internal ITAD activities are often performed by employees who are given little or no guidance from senior management.
Individual IT Asset Managers are typically responsible for developing processes that support lifecycle management. These unsung heroes of the IT world are then left to track and manage each of their organization’s assets — including during disposal when the risk of a breach increases significantly.
And unfortunately, most vendors do very little to shield these ITAMs should a breach occur.
That’s because their business is based on a traditional, trust-based approach that:
Fortunately, there’s a simple yet effective way for ITAMs to combat trust-based issues that plague disposal vendors: by taking a page from security’s playbook and recommending that their organization switch to a Zero-Trust ITAD Framework.
The Zero-Trust security model has gained acceptance as the go-to framework for network security. The point of Zero-Trust is not to make networks more trusted; it’s to eliminate the concept of trust.
Likewise, the point of Zero-Trust ITAD is not to make disposal vendors more trusted; it’s to eliminate the concept of trust from ITAD.
Zero-Trust ITAD takes the burden of responsibility off of ITAM and places it back where it should be: with the vendor. It’s the most effective way for asset managers to limit their exposure while safeguarding their organization from liability.
To avoid guilt by association, ITAMs must maintain a strict policy of professionalism such that no criticism can be made. A Zero-Trust approach keeps ITAM beyond reproach and above suspicion.
Advocating a Zero-Trust approach positions ITAM as part of the solution. If the worst happens and your company is protected, you’re a rockstar. If management instead wants to stick with a trust-based model and is left exposed, you’re off the hook.
Of course, you’ll need a strategy in hand before bringing it up with your organization’s decision-makers.
Whereas Zero-Trust network access is about permission (Do you have permission to be on this network?), Zero-Trust ITAD is about possession (Do you have possession of this asset?).
There are 4 crucial steps companies need to take in order to implement an effective Zero-Trust model for their ITAD program. These are:
With these precautions in place, executives and IT managers can limit their exposure and help protect themselves in the event of a breach.
New challenges will always require new ways of thinking. No matter how effective your data security has been in the past, it’s imperative that your organization keeps up with industry shifts in order to remain protected.
That’s why Zero-Trust is a must for network access — and why it should extend to your decommissioned IT assets. After all, if you can’t trust devices while they’re on your network, why would you trust them after they’ve been disposed of?
Schedule a call with us today and arm yourself with the tools & resources you need to make the switch to Zero-Trust.
This post was originally shared on the IT Asset Knowledgebase of IAITAM.
Morgan Stanley paid $161.5 million after 42 decommissioned servers went missing, and only found out…
Breach after breach has shown that IT asset disposition is a blind spot. The Defensible…
Certification in ITAD proves vendor credibility, while verification ensures ongoing compliance. Veridy Verification enhances security,…
Federal Agency takes risky ITAD gamble with remote wiping. Fired USAID workers will have to…
ITAD fears costing you? Debunk 3 myths! Fixing IT asset disposition is simpler, cheaper, &…
CISO Alert: Don't let ITAD blind spots become a career-ending SEC fine. Neglected IT disposal…
This website uses cookies.